Interpreting Long Service Through Cultural Lenses

Interpreting Long Service Through Cultural Lenses

Introduction

Recognizing long service in the workplace is crucial for fostering a culture of appreciation and loyalty among employees. It not only acknowledges the dedication and hard work of individuals but also serves as a powerful motivator for others. However, the way long service is recognized can vary significantly across different cultures, making it essential for HR professionals to approach these programs with cultural sensitivity.

Cultural lenses play a pivotal role in shaping recognition programs. What may be considered a meaningful gesture in one culture might be perceived as insignificant or even inappropriate in another. For instance, public acknowledgment might be highly valued in some cultures, while others might prefer more private forms of recognition. Understanding these cultural nuances is vital for creating a recognition program that resonates with a diverse workforce.

Key Facts to Consider

  • Public vs. Private Recognition: Some cultures value public acknowledgment, while others prefer private recognition.
  • Gift Giving: The type and value of gifts can vary greatly across cultures.
  • Celebratory Events: The format and scale of celebratory events can differ based on cultural norms.

Moreover, cultural awareness in recognition programs can enhance employee engagement and retention. When employees feel that their cultural backgrounds are respected and acknowledged, they are more likely to feel valued and committed to the organization. This, in turn, can lead to increased productivity and a more harmonious workplace.

In conclusion, HR professionals must consider the cultural contexts of their employees when designing long service recognition programs. By doing so, they can create more inclusive and effective programs that truly honor the contributions of all employees, regardless of their cultural backgrounds.

Shared Rituals That Enhance Workplace Belonging

Cultural Dimensions in Long Service Recognition

When designing long service awards, it is crucial to consider the cultural dimensions that shape employee perceptions and values. Individualism versus collectivism plays a significant role in how employees view recognition. In individualistic cultures, employees may value personal achievements and recognition, whereas in collectivist cultures, group harmony and collective accomplishments are more highly regarded. Therefore, long service awards in individualistic societies might focus on individual milestones and personal contributions, while in collectivist cultures, awards may emphasize team achievements and the employee's role within the group.

Power distance, another cultural dimension, influences how employees perceive authority and hierarchy. In high power distance cultures, employees may expect recognition to come from senior management, valuing formal ceremonies and public acknowledgments. Conversely, in low power distance cultures, employees might appreciate more informal and peer-driven recognition programs that foster a sense of equality and shared success.

Uncertainty avoidance also impacts the design of long service awards. In cultures with high uncertainty avoidance, employees may prefer structured and predictable recognition programs with clear criteria and rewards. In contrast, cultures with low uncertainty avoidance might be more receptive to flexible and innovative recognition methods that allow for creativity and spontaneity in celebrating long service.

Key Cultural Dimensions to Consider

  • Individualism vs. Collectivism: Focus on personal vs. team achievements.
  • Power Distance: Formal vs. informal recognition methods.
  • Uncertainty Avoidance: Structured vs. flexible recognition programs.

By understanding these cultural dimensions, HR professionals can create more effective and meaningful long service recognition programs that resonate with their diverse workforce, fostering a sense of belonging and appreciation across different cultural backgrounds.

Historical Context of Long Service Awards

Origins Recognition

The concept of recognizing long service has ancient roots, dating back to civilizations where loyalty and dedication were paramount. Early forms of acknowledgment included public ceremonies and honorary titles bestowed upon individuals who served their communities or leaders for extended periods. These practices were not only a means of gratitude but also served to reinforce societal values and norms. Over centuries, the methods and significance of such recognitions evolved, adapting to the changing socio-political landscapes and cultural values of different eras.

Cultural Shifts

As societies progressed, the criteria and methods for recognizing long service underwent significant transformations. Cultural shifts played a crucial role in reshaping these practices. For instance, the industrial revolution brought about changes in work environments and employee expectations, leading to the introduction of more formalized recognition programs. These programs began to reflect the evolving workplace dynamics and the growing importance of employee satisfaction and retention.

Modern Practices

In contemporary times, long service recognition has become a sophisticated aspect of corporate culture. Modern practices encompass a wide range of acknowledgments, from service awards and ceremonies to financial bonuses and public recognitions. Companies now tailor their recognition programs to align with their corporate values and the diverse cultural backgrounds of their workforce. This personalization ensures that the recognition is meaningful and relevant to the employees.

Key Facts About Modern Recognition Programs

  • Tailored to corporate values and employee diversity
  • Include service awards, ceremonies, financial bonuses, and public recognitions
  • Focus on personalization for meaningful impact

Global Influences

The globalization of businesses has further influenced long service recognition practices. Companies operating in multiple countries must navigate diverse cultural norms and expectations regarding employee acknowledgment. This has led to the adoption of more inclusive and culturally sensitive recognition programs. Understanding and respecting these cultural differences is crucial for multinational corporations to effectively honor their employees' long-term commitment.

Future Trends

Looking ahead, the evolution of long service recognition is likely to be shaped by emerging workplace trends and technological advancements. The rise of remote work and digital communication platforms may introduce new ways to celebrate and acknowledge long-serving employees. Additionally, there is a growing emphasis on recognizing not just the duration of service, but also the quality and impact of an employee's contributions. This shift towards a more holistic approach to recognition reflects the changing priorities of modern workplaces.

Global vs. Local Approaches

Implementing a global recognition program for long service requires a delicate balance between maintaining a cohesive global identity and adapting to local cultural nuances. On one hand, a unified global program can foster a sense of belonging and shared values across the organization, reinforcing the company's mission and vision worldwide. This approach ensures that all employees, regardless of location, feel equally valued and recognized for their dedication and contributions.

On the other hand, cultural differences can significantly impact how recognition is perceived and received. What may be considered a meaningful gesture in one culture might be seen as insignificant or even offensive in another. Therefore, it is crucial to tailor certain aspects of the recognition program to align with local customs, traditions, and values. This might involve adjusting the types of awards given, the timing of recognition events, or even the manner in which recognition is communicated.

Key Considerations for Balancing Global and Local Needs:

  • Regularly consult with local HR teams to understand cultural preferences and sensitivities.
  • Conduct employee surveys to gather feedback on the recognition program.
  • Provide cultural sensitivity training for global HR leaders.
  • Be flexible and willing to adapt the program based on local input and changing cultural landscapes.

A successful global recognition program should be flexible enough to incorporate local feedback and adapt to changing cultural landscapes. This can be achieved through regular consultations with local HR teams, employee surveys, and cultural sensitivity training for global HR leaders. By striking this balance, companies can create a recognition program that is both globally consistent and locally relevant, ensuring that every employee feels truly appreciated for their long-term commitment.

Case Studies

In today's globalized business environment, companies with diverse workforces must navigate cultural differences to create effective long service recognition programs. One notable example is the multinational technology corporation, Tech Innovators Inc. Recognizing the importance of cultural sensitivity, they tailored their long service awards to align with local customs and values. In Japan, where group harmony and respect for hierarchy are paramount, the company introduced a ceremony that involved the entire team, emphasizing collective achievement. Employees who reached significant service milestones received traditional gifts, such as high-quality stationery, symbolizing respect and appreciation.

Conversely, in the United States, where individual accomplishments are celebrated, Tech Innovators Inc. implemented a more personalized approach. Employees were given the option to choose from a range of rewards, including extra vacation days, professional development courses, or monetary bonuses. This flexibility allowed employees to select rewards that aligned with their personal preferences and career goals.

Another example is Global Retail Group, which operates in multiple countries across Europe and Asia. They faced the challenge of creating a unified recognition program that respected regional differences. To address this, they established a core set of recognition principles, such as transparency, fairness, and inclusivity, while allowing local managers to adapt the program to fit cultural norms. In Germany, where precision and order are valued, the company introduced a tiered recognition system with clear criteria for each milestone. In contrast, in India, where relationships and personal connections are crucial, the program included team-building activities and community service opportunities as part of the recognition process.

These examples illustrate that successful long service recognition programs require a deep understanding of cultural contexts and a willingness to adapt traditional practices to meet the diverse needs of a global workforce. By doing so, companies can foster a sense of belonging and appreciation among employees, regardless of their cultural background.

Key Facts for Effective Recognition Programs

  • Understanding local customs and values is crucial for designing relevant recognition programs.
  • Flexibility in reward options can enhance employee satisfaction and engagement.
  • Core recognition principles should be established, with room for local adaptation.
  • Involving employees in the recognition process can increase its effectiveness and meaningfulness.

FAQ

Q: How can HR departments ensure that long service recognition programs are inclusive and respectful of all cultural backgrounds?

A: HR departments can ensure inclusivity and respect by conducting thorough cultural research, engaging with local employees to understand their preferences and values, and providing training for managers on cultural sensitivity. It’s also beneficial to establish a feedback mechanism where employees can voice their opinions on the recognition program, allowing for continuous improvement and adaptation.

Challenges and Solutions

Implementing culturally sensitive long service recognition programs can present several challenges. One common issue is the lack of understanding or appreciation of diverse cultural norms and values related to work and recognition. This can lead to misunderstandings and even offense if the recognition methods do not align with employees' cultural expectations. Another challenge is the potential for favoritism or bias in the recognition process, which can arise if certain cultural groups are inadvertently overlooked or undervalued. Additionally, communication barriers, such as language differences, can hinder the effectiveness of recognition programs, making it difficult for employees to fully engage with or appreciate the efforts.

To address these challenges, companies should start by conducting thorough cultural audits to understand the diverse backgrounds and preferences of their workforce. This involves engaging with employees through surveys, focus groups, and one-on-one discussions to gather insights into what forms of recognition are most meaningful to them. Training HR staff and managers on cultural competence can also help ensure that recognition efforts are inclusive and respectful of all cultural backgrounds. Furthermore, implementing a flexible recognition program that allows for customization based on individual preferences can enhance engagement and satisfaction. Regular feedback mechanisms should be established to continually assess the effectiveness of the program and make necessary adjustments. By taking these steps, companies can create a more inclusive and effective long service recognition program that resonates with a diverse workforce.

Key Strategies for Success

  1. Conduct cultural audits to understand employee preferences.
  2. Train HR and managers on cultural competence.
  3. Implement a flexible recognition program.
  4. Establish regular feedback mechanisms.

FAQ

Q: How can we ensure our recognition program is truly inclusive?

A: To ensure your recognition program is inclusive, start by conducting cultural audits to understand the diverse backgrounds and preferences of your workforce. Engage employees through surveys, focus groups, and one-on-one discussions. Train HR staff and managers on cultural competence to ensure recognition efforts are respectful and inclusive. Implement a flexible recognition program that allows for customization based on individual preferences and establish regular feedback mechanisms to continually assess and adjust the program.

Employee Engagement and Cultural Sensitivity

Recognizing long service in a culturally sensitive manner can significantly enhance employee engagement and retention. When employees feel that their cultural backgrounds and values are acknowledged and respected, they are more likely to feel a sense of belonging and loyalty to the organization. This recognition fosters a positive work environment where employees are motivated to contribute their best efforts.

Culturally sensitive long service recognition involves understanding and incorporating the diverse cultural norms and values of the workforce. For instance, some cultures place a high value on public acknowledgment and celebration, while others may prefer more private forms of recognition. By tailoring recognition programs to respect these differences, companies can create a more inclusive atmosphere.

Moreover, culturally sensitive recognition can lead to higher employee satisfaction. When employees see that their unique contributions are valued, they are more likely to feel appreciated and motivated. This, in turn, can reduce turnover rates as employees are less likely to seek opportunities elsewhere.

Key Benefits of Culturally Sensitive Recognition

  • Enhanced employee engagement and retention
  • Creation of a positive and inclusive work environment
  • Increased employee satisfaction and motivation
  • Reduced turnover rates
  • Attraction of top talent valuing diversity and inclusion

Incorporating cultural sensitivity into long service recognition also demonstrates a company's commitment to diversity and inclusion. This can attract top talent who are looking for employers that value and respect diversity. Ultimately, a culturally sensitive approach to recognizing long service not only enhances employee engagement and retention but also strengthens the overall corporate culture.

Future Trends

As globalization continues to reshape the corporate landscape, the recognition of long service is undergoing a significant transformation. Companies with diverse workforces are increasingly aware that a one-size-fits-all approach to employee recognition may not resonate across different cultural contexts. Future trends in long service recognition will likely emphasize customization and cultural sensitivity. Organizations may adopt more inclusive practices that honor the unique traditions and values of their global employees. This could involve offering a range of recognition options, from monetary awards to experiential gifts, allowing employees to choose what holds the most meaning for them.

Key Facts:

  • Customization of recognition options to align with individual cultural preferences.
  • Increased use of technology for personalized and immediate recognition.
  • Shift towards more public and ceremonial acknowledgments.
  • Enhanced employee engagement and loyalty through culturally sensitive recognition.

Additionally, there may be a shift towards more public and ceremonial acknowledgments, reflecting the importance of community and social recognition in many cultures. As companies become more attuned to the cultural nuances of their workforce, they will likely see increased employee engagement and loyalty. The integration of technology will also play a role, enabling more personalized and immediate recognition that can be tailored to individual preferences and cultural backgrounds. In this evolving landscape, the key to effective long service recognition will be the ability to adapt and innovate in ways that truly honor and celebrate the diverse contributions of employees.

Employee retention is the ability of an organization to retain its employees and ensure sustainability. Employee retention can be represented by a simple statistic (for example, a retention rate of 80% usually indicates that an organization kept 80% of its employees in a given period). Employee retention is also the strategies employers use to try to retain the employees in their workforce.

In a business setting, the goal of employers is usually to decrease employee turnover, thereby decreasing training costs, recruitment costs and loss of talent and of organisational knowledge. Some employers seek "positive turnover" whereby they aim to maintain only those employees whom they consider to be high performers.

Cost of turnover

[edit]

Studies have shown that cost related to directly replacing an employee can be as high as 50–60% of the employee's annual salary, but the total cost of turnover can reach as high as 90–200% of the employee's annual salary.[1] These costs include candidate views, new hire training, the internal recruiter's salary, the costs to retain a 3rd party recruiter, separation processing, job errors, lost sales, reduced morale and a number of other costs to the organization. Turnover also affects organizational performance. High-turnover industries such as retailing, food services, call centres, elder-care nurses, and salespeople make up almost a quarter of the United States population. Replacing workers in these industries is less expensive than in other, more stable, employment fields but costs can still reach over $500 per employee.[2] As of November 2022, Gallup found that 49% of U.S. employees were watching for or actively seeking a new job.[3]

Theory

[edit]

An alternative motivation theory to Maslow's hierarchy of needs is the motivator-hygiene (Herzberg's) theory. While Maslow's hierarchy implies the addition or removal of the same need stimuli will enhance or detract from the employee's satisfaction, Herzberg's findings indicate that factors garnering job satisfaction are separate from factors leading to poor job satisfaction and employee turnover. Herzberg's system of needs is segmented into motivators and hygiene factors. Hygiene factors include expected conditions that if missing will create dissatisfaction. Examples of hygiene factors include bathrooms, lighting, and the appropriate tools for a given job. Employers must utilize positive reinforcement methods while maintaining expected hygiene factors to maximize employee satisfaction and retention.[4]

Flexible work arrangements

[edit]

Flexible work arrangements (FWAs) involve adapting an organization's work system to become more flexible, which may include adjusting how tasks are distributed among employees or allowing staff to set their own working hours and location. Although FWAs existed before the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of FWAs surged during the pandemic. According to a 2023 OECD report, almost all public sector organizations in OECD countries implemented flexible working arrangements, at least in the form of part-time work and flextime.[5]

FWAs were found to have a positive impact on employee retention and also organizational productivity in a 2022 study.[6]

FWAs increase flexibility in when, where, and sometimes how employees work. As a result, employees with higher autonomy tend to value their jobs more, experience greater happiness and job satisfaction, and are more likely to stay with their employer.[7] Employees who work under FWAs report greater work-life balance satisfaction, which reduces turnover.[8]

FWAs can sometimes negatively impact employee retention.[9] Issues such as stress and work-life conflict from unclear working hours, isolation due to a lack of physical interaction in remote work, health problems caused by compressed workweeks, or reduced engagement and productivity due to inadequate work tools can all arise.

A large-scale field experiment by Bloom, Han, and Liang (2024) found that employees offered a hybrid schedule—three days in the office and two days at home—were 35 percent less likely to quit over a two-year period than those required to work on-site full-time.[10]

In September 2024 the New Zealand Government issued updated guidance for public service agencies stating that working from home "is not an entitlement" and must be mutually agreed between employer and employee. The guidance requires that remote arrangements "must not compromise employee performance or the objectives of the agency," and directs agencies to monitor and report the number and type of agreements to the Public Service Commission, which will publish the data for transparency.[11]

Equity considerations further complicate retention outcomes. Hybrid policies can inadvertently favor employees with suitable home office environments and high-speed internet, while disadvantaging those in small or shared living spaces. Research also shows gendered effects: hybrid work can help retain women with caregiving responsibilities, yet some women report slower advancement when working remotely more frequently than male colleagues.[12]

To maximize the retention advantages of remote and hybrid models, a report from McKinsey recommend clear performance metrics, regular virtual check-ins, and intentional efforts to maintain organizational culture. [13]

Technological advancements in retention strategies

[edit]

Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools have been used to analyze employee performance metrics to attempt to identify patterns that may indicate potential turnover.[14][15]

HR analytics has been used to identify the root causes of employee attrition.[16][17]

Diversity and inclusion

[edit]

Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives are designed to promote equity, combat discrimination, and provide support for diverse employee needs. Research conducted by Ashikali and Groeneveld in 2015 established that the positive effect of diversity management on employee commitment is often mediated by the inclusiveness of the organizational culture and the role of transformational leadership.[18] Supervisors who promote inclusion are required for these initiatives to be successful. Trochmann, Stewart, and Ragusa (2023) found that positive perceptions of diversity and inclusion were significantly associated with higher levels of job satisfaction and overall workplace happiness in racially diverse agencies.[19] Brimhall, Lizano, and Barak (2014) emphasized that a positive diversity climate reduces employees' intention to leave by fostering a sense of inclusion and job satisfaction.[20]

Ritz and Alfes (2018) showed that in multilingual public administrations, employees' attachment to their jobs increased when their supervisors actively supported diversity and fostered an inclusive environment.[21] Choi and Rainey (2014) highlighted the importance of leadership in promoting perceived organizational fairness.[22]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Cascio, W.F. 2006. Managing Human Resources: Productivity, Quality of Work Life, Profits (7th ed.). Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin/McGraw-Hill. Mitchell, T.R., Holtom, B.C., & Lee, T.W. 2001. How to keep your best employees:
  2. ^ "Labours Lost". The Economist. Retrieved 18 January 2015.
  3. ^ Gallup's Indicators: Employee Retention & Attraction
  4. ^ Breaugh, James A., and Mary Starke. "Research on Employee Recruitment: So Many Studies, So Many Remaining Questions." Journal of Management (2000): 305-434. Web. 12 March 2011.
  5. ^ OECD (2023-06-30). "Flexible ways of working". Government at a Glance 2023. OECD. doi:10.1787/ed219e29-en. ISBN 978-92-64-67279-6.
  6. ^ University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria; Onyekwelu, Njideka Phina; Monyei, Ezieshi Francis; Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria; Muogbo, Uju Sussan; Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University, Igbariam, Nigeria (2022-12-01). "Flexible Work Arrangements and Workplace Productivity: Examining The Nexus". International Journal of Financial, Accounting, and Management. 4 (3): 303–314. doi:10.35912/ijfam.v4i3.1059.cite journal: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  7. ^ Metselaar, Samantha Alexandra; den Dulk, Laura; Vermeeren, Brenda (September 2023). "Teleworking at Different Locations Outside the Office: Consequences for Perceived Performance and the Mediating Role of Autonomy and Work-Life Balance Satisfaction". Review of Public Personnel Administration. 43 (3): 456–478. doi:10.1177/0734371X221087421. ISSN 0734-371X.
  8. ^ "Analysis of the Pros and Cons of Implementing Flexible Working Arrangements and Optimization of Strategies". Academic Journal of Business & Management. 5 (27). 2023. doi:10.25236/AJBM.2023.052712.
  9. ^ Soga, Lebene Richmond; Bolade-Ogunfodun, Yemisi; Mariani, Marcello; Nasr, Rita; Laker, Benjamin (2022-03-01). "Unmasking the other face of flexible working practices: A systematic literature review". Journal of Business Research. 142: 648–662. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.024. hdl:11585/858268. ISSN 0148-2963.
  10. ^ Bloom, Nicholas; Han, Ruobing; Liang, James (2024). "Hybrid working from home improves retention without damaging performance". Nature. 630 (8018): 920–925. Bibcode:2024Natur.630..920B. doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07500-2. ISSN 1476-4687. PMC 11208135. PMID 38867040.
  11. ^ "New work-from-home guidance for public service". Beehive.govt.nz. New Zealand Government. 23 September 2024. Retrieved 19 September 2025.
  12. ^ Barrero, José María; Bloom, Nicholas; Davis, Stephen J. (2024). "The global persistence of work from home". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 121 (4): 1595–1605. doi:10.1073/pnas.2213512120. PMC 10772564. PMID 38151830.
  13. ^ "Flexible work's enduring appeal affects workers, employers, and real estate". McKinsey & Company. 2025-03-18. Retrieved 19 September 2025.
  14. ^ Marín Díaz, Gabriel; Galán Hernández, José Javier; Galdón Salvador, José Luis (January 2023). "Analyzing Employee Attrition Using Explainable AI for Strategic HR Decision-Making". Mathematics. 11 (22): 4677. doi:10.3390/math11224677. hdl:10251/212976. ISSN 2227-7390.
  15. ^ Hall, Owen P. (2021). "Managing employee turnover: machine learning to the rescue". International Journal of Data Science. 6 (1) 117472: 57. doi:10.1504/IJDS.2021.117472. ISSN 2053-0811.
  16. ^ Virani, Dr. Farida (2023). "Application of HR Analytics in Business". Met Management Review. 07 (2): 05–19. doi:10.34047/mmr.2020.7201 (inactive 19 September 2025).cite journal: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of September 2025 (link)
  17. ^ Malik, Ashish; Budhwar, Pawan; Patel, Charmi; Srikanth, N. R. (2022-03-26). "May the bots be with you! Delivering HR cost-effectiveness and individualised employee experiences in an MNE". The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 33 (6): 1148–1178. doi:10.1080/09585192.2020.1859582. ISSN 0958-5192.
  18. ^ Ashikali, Tanachia; Groeneveld, Sandra (June 2015). "Diversity Management in Public Organizations and Its Effect on Employees' Affective Commitment: The Role of Transformational Leadership and the Inclusiveness of the Organizational Culture". Review of Public Personnel Administration. 35 (2): 146–168. doi:10.1177/0734371X13511088. ISSN 0734-371X.
  19. ^ Trochmann, Maren; Stewart, Kendra; Ragusa, Jordan (December 2023). "The Impact of Employee Perceptions of Inclusion in a Racially Diverse Agency: Lessons From a State Government Survey". Public Personnel Management. 52 (4): 543–565. doi:10.1177/00910260231187544. ISSN 0091-0260.
  20. ^ Brimhall, Kim C.; Lizano, Erica Leeanne; Mor Barak, Michàlle E. (2014-05-01). "The mediating role of inclusion: A longitudinal study of the effects of leader–member exchange and diversity climate on job satisfaction and intention to leave among child welfare workers". Children and Youth Services Review. 40: 79–88. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.03.003. ISSN 0190-7409.
  21. ^ Ritz, Adrian; Alfes, Kerstin (March 2018). "Multicultural public administration: Effects of language diversity and dissimilarity on public employees' attachment to employment". Public Administration. 96 (1): 84–103. doi:10.1111/padm.12366. ISSN 0033-3298.
  22. ^ Choi, Sungjoo; Rainey, Hal G. (December 2014). "Organizational Fairness and Diversity Management in Public Organizations: Does Fairness Matter in Managing Diversity?". Review of Public Personnel Administration. 34 (4): 307–331. doi:10.1177/0734371X13486489. ISSN 0734-371X.

A firm is a legal entity that represents an organization of legal persons with a particular, shared purpose, such as the earning of earnings or the benefit of society. Depending upon jurisdiction, firms can take on various forms, such as voluntary associations, nonprofit organizations, organization entities, economic entities, banks, and educational institutions. Throughout jurisdictions, companies have usually developed to have specific typical legal attributes, consisting of different lawful character, limited liability, transferable shares, capitalist ownership, and a managerial hierarchy. Depending upon territory, the term "business" might or might not be synonymous with company, partnership, firm and society. Companies are controlled by firm law, which is also known as corporate regulation in some territories. Integrated business are created by and registered with the state, whereas unincorporated business are not. When a business closes, it might need to be sold off to stay clear of further legal responsibilities. Firms might link and jointly register themselves as brand-new companies referred to as corporate groups, collections of moms and dad and subsidiary companies.

.